Home Authors Books Subjects Events Software Features Links Newsletter Gifts Blog Write Review What's New
Review - The Science of Middle Earth - Henry Gee
When I saw this book (subtitled "Explaining The Science Behind The Greatest Fantasy Epic Ever Told!" in the US edition), I thought it was time to put my foot down. Okay, Douglas Adams' delirious fantasy, The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy was largely a science fiction parody, so Science of Hitchhiker's made sense. Even Science of Discworld works, thanks to the conceit of treating it as the view of fantasy characters of Discworld observing our science. But Science of Middle Earth? Isn't it all swords and sorcery? What's more, Tolkein was famously a romantic who longed for a non-existent bucolic rural past, typified by the hobbits' Shire (while conveniently forgetting rampant disease, infant mortality and frequent malnutrition, just some of the joys of the real rural past). Didn't Tolkein attack the whole idea of science and technology as the black vision of the likes of his number II baddy, Saruman?
Henry Gee, a senior editor of the definitive science journal Nature in his day job, makes a striking case for taking a different viewpoint. He reminds us firstly that Tolkein's own speciality, the study of words and language, a subject that is at the heart of The Lord of the Rings and his other heavy duty fiction, is a science. He also makes it clear that Tolkein wasn't anti-science per se (apparently Isaac Asimov was a favourite of his). What he was against was the wrong attitude to science - letting it control us, rather than the other way around. In fact, Gee argues persuasively that, for instance, the Elves in LoTR don't use magic (they say this themselves), but technology that is so in tune with nature that it's hard to distinguish from it.
All in all this a fascinating and very unusual entry in the "Science of..." league. Firstly it's a very literary and precise book for such a subject. There's as much about language as there is about "normal" science, and Gee's approach has a scholarly care that may seem a little dry to the followers of more straight forward popular science, but works surprisingly well. After the aspects of language, a lot of space is given to the biology of Middle Earth - where did orcs come from? What is the biology of ents? - all fascinating stuff.
There is, sadly, one huge scientific error, which I was surprised to see from a Nature senior editor (I can only guess from the emphasis on biology that this is Gee's speciality, where the error was in physics.) He suggests that the palantiri, the long distance seeing stones that feature in the book could be linked by quantum entanglement, allowing instant communication. The trouble is, while quantum entanglement does provide an instant link across any distance, it can only provide the result of a random outcome - it can't instantly communicate any information. (It's just as well: if it could, it would be possible to send a message through time and disrupt causality.) It's fine to come up with real world scientific solutions to oddities of fiction, but they ought to make sense with science as we know it.
Just occasionally, for instance when Gee was struggling to explain how the One Ring could make people invisible I wanted to shout "What's the point? It's just a story!" But that's not the main reaction to this book. Any Tolkein fan will find fascinating insights into the man and a side of his interests that is wildly underrepresented in what has been written about him. And as an exercise in "Science of..." attached to a work of fiction it's one of the best around. Recommended.
Only in paperback
Reviewed by Brian Clegg
This site has no connection with Popular Science magazine or other sites and publications with a similar name.
Much of the content of this site is written by popular science writers or friends of popular science writers. Inevitably many of the reviews in such a small community are written by or about someone we know. We always aim to be impartial in our reviews, but there is a connection which we need make clear, as there is no intention to deceive. The content of any review or article is solely the opinion of the author and should not be read or understood on any other basis. The site exists to promote popular science writing and popular science authors and for this reason should be considered promotional material, just as the editorial reviews in an online bookshop or the blurb on the back of a book should be considered promotional.
The website should not be eaten or used where it can come into contact with water.
Disagree with our review? Want to comment on a feature? Contact us at info@ popularscience.co.uk - have your say!
Part of the site
Copyright © Creativity
Unleashed Limited 2005
Last update 05 June 2007